Welcome to Finance and Fury. How useful is investment theory when it comes to practically investing and calculating an expected return?

Lot of theory when it comes to investing – efficient frontiers, EMH – working out expected returns

In this episode – we will look at One aspect – CAPM – and look at Beta – see how well this can be used when selecting investing –

What Is the Capital Asset Pricing Model?

  1. The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) describes the relationship between the risk (volatility) of the market and expected returnfor an investment – used in the share market mainly –
    1. Foundation for theory that is used throughout finance for pricing securitiesthat have risk – volatility –  
  2. The formula – calculating the expected return is as follows:
    1. Expected return = RF + BETA X Risk Premium
    2. Risk free rate of return – Investors expect to be compensated for risk and the time value of money. The risk-free rate in the CAPM formula accounts for the time value of money.
    3. 10-year bond is normally the risk-free rate
  3. The other components of the CAPM formula look at the incentives for an investor taking on additional risk
    1. This is due to investments beta is then multiplied by the market risk premium
    2. Risk Premium = Expected return of market – RF
      1. the return expected from the market above the risk-free rate
      2. gives an investor the required return or discount rate they can use to find the value of an asset.
    3. But the big one is the Beta – The beta of a potential investment is a measure of how much risk the investment has when compared to the market –
    4. The aim of Beta is a measure of the volatility of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole and is meant to show if the investment has a chance to provide above market returns
    5. The value of Beta effectively describes the activity of a security’s returns as it responds to swings in the market.
      1. If a share is riskier than the market, it will have a beta greater than one. If a stock has a beta of less than one, the formula assumes it will reduce the risk of a portfolio – can be positive or negative
      2. Beta Value Equal to 1.0 – indicates that its price activity is strongly correlated with the market – could either be the index or a fund/investment that acts exactly like it – active fund that is a benchmark hugger –
  • Beta Value Less Than One – theoretically less volatile than the market – seen as less risky than high betas
  1. Beta Value Greater Than One – indicates that the investments price is theoretically more volatile than the market – for example – if a shares beta is 1.5 – assumed to be 50% more volatile than the market – indicates that adding this investment to a portfolio will increase the risk, but may also increase its expected return
  2. Can also have Negative Beta Value – Some stocks have negative betas. A beta of -1.0 means that the stock is inversely correlated to the market benchmark – inverse ETFsare designed to have negative betas – not great to have two assets with negative betas –
  1. Examples – RF 2%, market return is 8% – CAPM relies on assumptions – come back to this
    1. Beta of 1 = ER= 2%+1x(8%-2%) = 8%
    2. Beta Greater than 1 – 3 = ER= 2%+3x(8%-2%) = 20%
    3. Beta less than 1 – 0.5 = ER= 2%+0.5x(8%-2%) = 5%
    4. Beta of -1 = -4% p.a. ER
  2. RF asset is low at the moment – long term – say it was 5% – how does this change
    1. Beta of 1 = ER= 5%+1x(8%-5%) = 8%
    2. Beta Greater than 1 – 3 = ER= 5%+3x(8%-5%) = 14%
    3. Beta less than 1 – 0.5 = ER= 5%+0.5x(8%-5%) = 6.5%
    4. Beta of -1 = 2% p.a. ER
  3. As the RF asset increases – the beta starts to become less important –
  4. But Theory that over the long term – additional beta means more growth – Is it true?

Beta in Theory vs. Beta in Practice

  1. In theory – beta assumes that a shares returns are normally distributed from a statistical perspective – average returns over time – but financial markets are prone to large surprises – like what has just occurred – the returns have outliers – not normally distributed – so the ER relying on Beta doesn’t have a short term (or LT) ability to predict the expected return
  2. How well does this stack up in practice – Look at BETA of a few managed funds – and returns
    1. Four funds to look at – compare Betas, the calculated ER, the actual 10y return

Beta

2.02

0.95

0.86

1

ER

14.120%

7.700%

7.160%

8.000%

AR-10y

6.69%

6.84%

7.75%

5.66%

Difference

-7.4300%

-0.8600%

0.5900%

-2.3400%

  1. Large Cap – benchmark unaware
  2. Large cap – geared – Beta of 2.02
  • Large Cap – active growth – 0.95
  1. Index – 1
  1. Compare long term returns – the differences are not what is expected based on theory – but make sense –
  1. How – betas less than 1 have less of a systematic risk – this is the Beta value of 1 in a way – the risk of the entire market declining – when the whole index collapses -this is an example of a systematic-risk event – the Systematic risk of the index by itself is un-diversifiable risk –
    1. If it is your only investment – it means your funds will lose value – but a beta of less than 1 means it is less volatile than the market – but it may be get a better long term return if it goes stable consistent upwards returns that compound over time
  2. Why Beta isnt the best way to think about risk – or expected returns –
    1. Also on the other side – an investment with a very low beta could have smaller price swings, but these may be in a long-term downtrend – so it looks like it is less risky – but locking in a long term loss
    2. Similarly, a high beta stock that is volatile in a mostly upward direction will increase the risk of a portfolio, but it may add gains as well. It’s recommended that investors using beta to evaluate a stock also evaluate it from other perspectives—such as fundamental or technical factors—before assuming it will add or remove risk from a portfolio.
  3. Another major problem of Beta – calculated using historical data points, it becomes less meaningful for investors looking to predict a future movements in prices – i.e. the expected return is relying on historical volatility –
    1. These data points become less useful for long-term investments – most risk measures like Beta are tracked over a 3 or 5 year timeframe – volatility can change significantly from year to year
    2. Also – volatility is a measure or price movements – but the price movements in both directions are not equally risky – or as good for your investment returns – i.e. volatility of 10% p.a. may either be up or down – Beta doesn’t track this
      1. The look-back period to determine a stock’s volatility is not standard because stock returns (and risk) are not normally distributed

Due to the problems of Beta – there are Problems With the CAPM

  1. Beyond Beta – the assumptions behind the CAPM formula have been shown to not work out in reality – most of modern financial theory rests on two major assumptions:
    1. First – markets are efficient – that is, relevant information about the companies is quickly and universally distributed and absorbed – there is no overbuying or overselling in markets – the market acts efficiently and the price of the market reflects the information that is available
    2. Second – these markets are dominated by rational, risk-averse investors, who seek to maximize their returns on their investments – therefore no buying high or selling low should occur – but emotions overrise the rational side of investors
  2. Other assumptions – that the risk-free rate and the expected return
    1. Risk free rate – assumed that it will remain constant over the long term –
      1. When this is used in getting the FV through discounting for cashflow – if the RF rate increases – it will increase the capital costs and make companies look overvalued – also the reverse is true – when it goes down – discounting for CF can make assets look undervalued – and good buys with higher Betas – which can be a massive trap
    2. Expected returns – The market portfolio that is used to find the market risk premium is only a theoretical value – it relies on assumptions – most of the time the index average returns is used – over a 10 or so year period as well – so the ASX200s return as a benchmark would be used for CAPM in Aus to substitute for the market – but this is an imperfect science as an be expected
  3. Regardless of these issues – the CAPM formula is still widely used because it is simple and allows for easy comparisons of investment alternatives – but markets are not simple – so watch out for relying on this if you are getting into investing

Summary – theory can help – but in understanding – practical use – limited – so when it comes to using these theories if you are getting into personal investments – it can be used in conjunction with other metrics when building a portfolio

  1. It is useful to understand how beta works – and how the expected returns

Thank you for listening to today’s episode. If you want to get in contact you can do so here: http://financeandfury.com.au/contact/

How do you use your superannuation funds to buy a property?

Welcome to Finance and Fury, The Say What Wednesdays Edition – Where each week we answer your questions Today's question comes from Cameron We are a couple, both aged 30 with approx 70k in each of our super accounts. We are interested in SMSFs with a view to...

What does your path to Financial Independence look like?

Welcome to Finance and Fury, The Say What Wednesday edition Today is a special episode – we have another resource available on our Resources Page... the Monthly Investment Targets Calculator  Question from Nick “I’m sure as a Financial Adviser you are quite aware of...

Artificial Intelligence and Investing: The future is here

Episode 29 Artificial Intelligence and Investing: The future is here Today’s episode of Finance & Fury we’re talking about Artificial Intelligence taking over the ETF and investment market. The discussion was actually started by one of our listeners, Gabriel who...

What types of superannuation accounts allow you to control your investments?

Welcome to Finance and Fury, the Say What Wednesday edition. This week, the question comes from Andrew: "Last episode you mentioned super and a product that lets you invest in third party platforms. Would like to hear more about that." What is super? Most people think...

Investing in the Share Market in 2019

Hi guys and welcome to Finance and Fury. Today we will start off on the miniseries with the best place to invest money in 2019. Investments to Consider in 2019 Where should you invest your money? Question plagues both beginning investors and established pros. We...

Are K Waves useful in the modern economy to forecast where we are likely to head?

Welcome to Finance and Fury, the Furious Friday Edition Today is a follow on from Last FF ep – on K waves – if haven’t listened – worthwhile to go check Today – is the cycle relevant today with central banks – and go through the most recent cycle – meant to start in...

The crash and depression of 1873 – When good infrastructure goes bad!

Welcome to Finance and Fury, the Furious Friday edition. Last Friday, we went through theory versus practical reality of public infrastructure spending  – roads and railroads are needed. In this episode - Look back at an economic crash – in relation to infrastructure...

Do you need a family trust?

Say What Wednesdays Do you need a family trust? This week’s question is, ‘do I need a family trust?’. I have had a few questions about this over the past weeks, however in order to avoid making this ‘personal advice’, I thought I’d just talk about it in more general...

Say What Wednesday: Paying your home loan off with debt

Say What Wednesday Paying your home loan off with debt How can you pay off a mortgage with debt? Velocity banking and Offset accounts This question comes from Tom a podcast listener. He asks “Just wondering if you have ever used Velocity banking at all to pay down...

ETFs and the greater economy – their impact on financial crises and bubbles bursting

Episode 17 ETFs and the greater economy - their impact on financial crises and bubbles bursting Though banks bear much of the blame for previous financial crises, ordinary investors play a more central role than most people realise… …through greed, and fear....

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This