Welcome to Finance and Fury, The Say What Wednesday edition. 

Today’s question comes from David

Hi Louis,

I must commend you on your contribution to the finance community. If you have thought me one thing, it’s that the more you learn the more you realise how little you know. So, one thing that does perplex me is the Australian made product of the offset account. Whilst I understand how they work and the power they have when used correctly, I can’t figure out why the banks have them. I mean it’s the modus operandi of the banks to extract money from lenders via the mechanism of interest. Call me a cynic but I feel the banks must have an ulterior motive to this play. I would love to know your thoughts. – David 

 

That is a great question – made me think as well and do some further digging – today – Offset accounts and Why banks allow them?

  1. First – the basic = Offset accounts are a type of deposit account that is directly linked to a loan – like a mortgage
    1. Money deposited into offset accounts effectively reduce the loans net position and the interest payable
    2. Means where a borrower has a deposit account and a loan (usually a housing loan) with the same institution.
      1. Instead of receiving interest on the deposit account, the interest payment due on the loan is calculated on the net balance of the loan
    3. As they act as deposit accounts – only ADI can offer true offset accounts – non-banks will offer redraw facility instead – which means the money is on the loan – different
  2. In Aus – Offset account balances currently total around $90 billion – almost over 6% of housing loans outstanding
    1. Annual growth in total housing debt of around 7-8% – Offset account balances grown by 30% – annual growth in net housing debt is still growing by 6-7% due to new loans –

Why banks allow them? – number of reasons

  1. Simple one – Better with them than another bank – Incentive to have your money with them and not the competition
    1. Also – repayments come from the offset accounts – easy for banks to have their funds – but minor
  2. But one of the major reasons – they Allow for the further growth of credit – remember – they are deposit accounts
    1. Because Offset accounts are deposit accounts – banks can use them as part of reserves in fractional lending for the creation of money
    2. RBA – Offset account balances have also been making a significant contribution to household deposit growth
      1. If offset balances weren’t in deposits but had paid the loan back – would reduce growth in household deposits by around 1% (from around 7-8%) -12-14% or so reduction
      2. Mortgage payments reduce the ‘stock of outstanding credit’ – i.e. total amount of loans and are a negative growth factor on total credit – if everyone makes additional repayments the credit growth shrinks – the credit growth can be negative = no new lending and only repayments is negative credit growth
    3. Offset accounts are an alternative form of mortgage prepayment that like an at-call deposit account –
      1. Because it acts like an at-call deposit account, any accumulated funds are easily available for withdrawal or for purchasing goods and services – They are treated as such – can be used as any other deposit for lending by the bank
      2. Also – while funds in the account are reducing your outstanding debt for the interest on the loan – you still have the same loan
    4. For the individual with a mortgage and uses an offset account or redraw – similar household economic effects – net housing debt and interest payable are reduced
    5. But for a bank – loans and deposits are higher than they otherwise would be – offset provides deposit funds and doesn’t give a negative credit growth effect – like redraw facilities do
      1. If that $90bn was sitting in the loan (i.e. paid off) – less lending due to fewer depositor funds
  3. Therefore – offset accounts Can increase banks lending income – not decrease it-
    1. Say loans are 4% – you can save 4% or banks can charge it –
    2. $100k in an offset – you save $4,000
    3. Banks use it to lend $800k (12.5% deposit ratio) – they make $32,000 – net $28k better off

Also – Other factors like bail-ins and deposit schemes

  1. Bail in-laws – We’ll leave a link on the website to the episodes covering the bail-in regulations and pitfall of this
    1. In short – as it is a deposit account – can be used as bail-in provision –
    2. Most people with loans would have much more in offsets than savings – or should at least –
    3. But the catch is that all your deposits will likely to be with one ADI – and potentially above the $250k
  2. Government Guarantees – May not actually help – You have a few problems there: A guarantee only applies to a bank going insolvent and collapsing— with not enough money left over for depositors. Bail-ins (if they are in fact legal) will just take your money to prevent that from happening. That is, the government guarantee won’t cover a bail-in.
    1. Guarantees are capped at $20B per ADI – stated in Financial System Legislation Amendment (Financial Claims Scheme and Other Measures) Bill 2008
      1. Activation of the EAFD 1.20 – A declaration outlines the total amount available to make payments to depositors of a declared ADI. For the first three years of the scheme (from 2008), the amount that can be appropriated for the purposes of meeting depositors’ entitlements is unlimited. After three years, the maximum that can be appropriated is $20 billion. The declaration must also outline the amount available for the administration costs for implementing the scheme up to a maximum of $100 million
      2. RBA aware of this – in their “Depositor Protection in Australia” – Payouts of deposits covered under the FCS [The Australian Government’s Financial Claims Scheme] are initially financed by the government through a standing appropriation of $20 billion per failed ADI [Authorized deposit-taking institutions]
    2. The total size of deposit accounts totalled $2 trillion (Commonwealth Bank— $581 billion, ANZ — $467 billion, NAB— $407 billion and WESTPAC — $533billion). This includes savings, term deposits, chequing, debit card, transaction accounts, mortgage offset accounts, pensioner deeming accounts, retirement savings accounts etc… So only $80 billion (or 4%) out of this $2 trillion dollars is actually covered by the guarantee.
    3. The question remains – once they activate it – where will the money come from?

In Summary

  1. Does benefit you – But so does repaying your home loan in most other means – except the accessibility – offsets are best for this
  2. But benefit the bank as well – you repaying the loan doesn’t benefit them as much as you keeping the loan and then being able to keep expanding credit using the deposits – take your $100k and lend $900k – which they make 3% –
    1. Also – more money with the bank to be used in ‘resolution proceedings’ with Bail in regulations

Thanks for the Great question David

Thanks for listening to today’s episode. If you want to get in contact you can do so here: http://financeandfury.com.au/contact

Say What Wednesday: The perfect investment mix

Say What Wednesdays The perfect investment mix Today’s Say What Wednesday question is from Linus. Linus asks, ‘I was just wondering what you think the ideal weighting of Australian (ASX200) ETFs, similar international ETFs and Bonds is in an investment portfolio? Love...

The story of Dave Portnoy and a warning to any new traders about overleveraging.

Welcome to Finance and Fury. This episode is about the story of Dave Portnoy and a warning to any new traders of overleveraging – or even using leverage if you are relatively inexperienced There are Millions of new investors are getting into the market- which is great...

The Financial Curse – When a Financial System does more harm than good

Welcome to Finance and Fury the Furious Friday Edition On the last episode we talked about the City of London Corporation, a mini plutocracy Today we are exploring at what point does a financial sector state to crowd out real economic growth? Referred to as the...

The lessons from the Nifty Fifty. Are we repeating the same mistakes of the past?

Welcome to Finance and Fury. Today’s episode is lessons from the nifty fifties – bit of a history lesson as well as looking back to lessons that can be learnt from this, to help not make mistakes of the past. This is a particular bubble and market correct that most...

Don’t get tricked! How to avoid living in a Trauma-based society by building towards your own future

Welcome to Finance and Fury, the Furious Friday Edition Today's episode is number 3 in this series – check out last 2 FF eps  episode 1 episode 2 Last ep – talked about media and the realities that they create – but they are not consistent – and massive hypocrites...

Why work your whole life, just to have nothing left over at the end?

Episode 8 Why work your whole life, just to have nothing left over? Pay yourself first! Keep your own money – why work for others, then have nothing left to show for it? You earn more over your lifetime with this strategy – you save more and get rich right? Regular...

Say What Wednesday: Considering refinancing your mortgage with a smaller online lender?

Welcome to Finance and Fury, the ‘Say What Wednesday’ edition. Today I’m here with Jayden! Today’s question comes from Gavin, “Is there anything to be considered when looking at refinancing mortgages with smaller lenders that run their business online like...

Investing in infrastructure as part of a wealth accumulation strategy.

Welcome to Finance and Fury.  This episode will looking at infrastructure as an asset class, to see if it can help to provide some diversification for portfolios and decent moving forward. Infrastructure – physical assets that provide services that are essential for...

Say What Wednesday: The ups and downs of Bitcoin – currency, investment opportunity, both… or neither?

Say What Wednesday The ups and downs of Bitcoin - currency, investment opportunity, both... or neither? Today’s question comes from Richie, who asks, “Have you been following the Bitcoin ETF at all? If so, are you able to do an episode on this and if it is worth...

Say What Wednesday: The tax implications of investing in shares; owning, holding, selling, dividends

Say What Wednesdays The tax implications of investing in shares; owning, holding, selling, dividends Welcome to Finance & Fury’s ‘Say What Wednesday’! Today’s question is from John; What are the tax implications of investing in shares, owning, holding, selling,...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This