Welcome to Finance and Fury, 

Past few Monday eps on Share concentration – and the holdings and influence that super funds have

Today – talk about the legislation put into place and the plans going on now where you might end up renting an apartment from your super fund or bank

The plan to help increase apartment supply – decline in prices = lower incentive for developers as a build to sell model – from slumping demand for apartment building

New residential product: “build-to-rent”

Won’t help Australia’s housing affordability stress, may make it worse, but it helps to achieve public policy objectives –

  1. widened housing diversity – for affordable housing close to city centres
  2. enhanced build standards – Avoid develop to sell disasters like Opal towers
  3. better-managed and secure form of rental housing – economies of scale from LCLs – which we will run through

Look into other areas this has been implemented to see how well objectives met

 

What is it? This refers to apartment blocks built specifically to be rented, at market rates or ‘affordable rates’, and held in single ownership as long-term income-generating assets

  1. Policy came to public attention when Labor reforms to taxation around build-to-rent leading up to the election
  2. Aim – to increase the supply of rental dwellings through developing a ‘build to rent’ and a large corporate landlord (LCL) sector –  While these two sectors may share similarities, there is a subtle difference between them.

 

Build to rent – developers and their financiers build multi-unit buildings and, instead of selling the units, retain them to rent to tenant households. Rents may be set at market rents or, for affordable housing, an appropriate discount to market rents could be offered with appropriate government support to make up the funding gap.

 

‘Build to rent’ is an established practice in both the UK and USA but it has not been taken up in Australia –  

  1. Australia’s tax settings, which were designed for a ‘build to sell’ model, as a major impediment, in particular land taxes and the inability to defer GST costs on construction materials makes retaining dwellings unprofitable.
  2. AHURI research identified a number of barriers for institutional investment in the Australian market, reducing the attractiveness of ‘build to rent’ for investment by the large banks, insurance companies and the superannuation funds. 
    1. In a nutshell – large financial companies will become the driver of investment in inner city apartments
    2. QLD – We have a program open for bids in May within 10km of CBD.
    3. Goldman Sachs is a major investor in one of the biggest build to rent companies in USA.

 

Large Corporate Landlords –

Buy to rent model – financial institutions that acquire large numbers of dwellings and make them available to the rental market, or potentially at a discount to market rents for low-income tenants if appropriate government support is provided.

  1. LCLs don’t necessarily build new housing stock, they can purchase properties in the market or through mergers and amalgamations with other LCLs. Indeed the largest LCL in the USA, Mid-America Apartments, (99,939 apartments in 2017)
  2. LCLs can merge with build to rent developers who can help manage rental dwellings

 

Proponents claim LCLs and ‘build to rent’ schemes offer greater supply of rental housing, greater security of tenure for tenants, and better professionalism in tenancy management than small scale ‘mum and dad’ landlords.

  1. These models have also been criticised in other countries for maximising rent increases and for evicting tenants
  2. In one case, 60 families were threatened with eviction in Ireland in 2016 when the LCL that owned the residential complex had to sell over 200 houses to an internationally based financial institution in order to repay debts
  3. From an international flow of money – part of the profit shifting scheme which caused the Ireland property bubbe
    1. QLD – Deputy Premier and Treasurer Jackie Trad today invited industry to register their ideas on how to deliver a large-scale Build-to-Rent development within 10kms of the Brisbane CBD. “Delivering these affordable rentals will contribute to the Government’s Queensland Housing Strategy 2017-2027 target of over 1000 affordable homes by 2022” – says homes but means high-density high-rises

 

Why hasn’t it taken off here yet?

 the tax treatment and returns in Australia make build-to-rent less viable.

  1. cost-effective variations of the build-to-rent model are being trialled, including student accommodation, co-living arrangements, or build-to-rent accommodation where the tenant has an option to buy their unit after a few years of renting – talked about in another ep
  2. constant rental income from tenants is a particularly appealing investment for institutions that seek reliable income, like super funds

 

What do the people implementing this want:

  1. under current conditions, even market-rate build-to-rent projects are barely viable – at least in Sydney. Australia’s urban housing markets are expensive to purchase land.
  2. a housing policy perspective –
    1. limitations on foreign purchases of residential property
    2. “withholding tax” decision that treats overseas-based institutional investment in rental property less favourably than investment in commercial property – Morrison doubled
  3. Since such global funds would likely lead the establishment of a new Australian build-to-rent asset class, revisiting the withholding tax changes could be a significant step in making build-to-rent a reality in Australia.

Will build-to-rent make housing more affordable?

  1. No – at least not in the short term. While Labor has offered separate affordable housing initiatives, build-to-rent developments themselves will not necessarily deliver affordable housing.
  2. evidence from existing build-to-rent developments suggest that rent will be more expensive than traditional renting arrangements.
    1. JLL research based in the UK found that on average, the premiums on build-to-rent accommodation were 11 percent over the respective local rental markets.

 

Who will be doing this –

The enduring owner might be, for instance, an insurance company, an Australian super fund, a foreign sovereign wealth fund, a private equity firm, or the building’s developer.

  1. Although new in Australia, build-to-rent is quite common in many other countries. Under its North American name, “multi-family housing” – 6.3m new apartments since 1992
  2. A scattering of build-to-rent schemes is already underway or completed, mainly in inner Sydney and Melbourne. And they may prove to be the forerunners of a new Australian residential property sector – but that is far from guaranteed.
  3. In Australia, our private rental market is almost entirely owned by small-scale mum-and-dad investors, so this kind of housing would be a largely new departure from typical Australian real estate
  4. Another property bubble – main access from massive financial companies – now you are competing for the property with financial institutions

Potential benefits –

  1. Done to manage the economy and help stimulate economic growth, expand the money supply through borrowings to help keep rates low
  2. May get better building standards – MAY – building to own long term versus build to sell – skip forward 100 years of this trend where companies own most buildings
  3. Increase demand for buying high-density residential property – Australians long term don’t want this (80%)

 

Proposal for policy –

to enable an affordable housing element the government is looking at allocating sections of federal or state-owned redevelopment sites to community housing providers at discounted rates.

  1. this strategy was recently advocated by newly designated federal housing minister Michael Sukkar.
  2. urban renewal projects like Sydney’s Central-to-Eveleigh and Rozelle Bays – a pretty big chunk of Syd –
    1. fulfill the widely voiced demand that 30% of these developments should be affordable housing
  3. Being implemented to fulfil several important public policy objectives.
  4. This comes from recommendations/policies laid out in UNs SDG (sustainable development goal) 11.1 and 11.3, along with SDG9 and SDG17, which is about increasing global partnership of multinational companies’ cooperation with Governments.
  5. The IMF needs somewhere to pump their SDRs into so they are using the SDGs of the UN which will cost trillions in funding, along with side private companies like Goldman sacs buying all the residential property here (which they have been doing in the programs in the USA).
  6. So end game of this build to rent is that we now have to compete with the largest companies in the world when wanting to buy any new residential stock coming onto the market.

 

Who will live in this? – come back to this 9Global migration compact

Thank you for listening, if you want to get in contact you can do so here

 

What not to invest in!

Hi everyone and welcome to Finance and Fury. If you missed last Monday’s episode on bank bail in laws, you might want to go back and catch up as this week’s episode follows on from that one. Today we’ll look at what to avoid holding as investment in the future, based...

Say What Wednesday: What is the real danger behind Climate Change?

Welcome to Finance and Fury, the Say What Wednesday edition. Today we are going to cover off on Climate Change. This may be a bit weird. But, the majority of proposed solutions are political/economic. Firstly, the taxation on CO2 emissions. What is this going to do to...

Recent market volatility – is the market crashing? Are we on the way to another GFC?

Episode 33 Recent market volatility - is the market crashing? Are we on the way to another GFC? Welcome to SWW …on a Monday … because we have been receiving a LOT of questions about what’s happening with this so-called “market crash”, why has the share market dropped...

Checking if your superannuation is appropriately invested for you.

Welcome to Finance and Fury. Today we’ll look at how to get the right investments in super. Because super funds take care of it for people – a lot of people don’t pay attention – so in this episode want to explain what to look for and how to help determine if your...

The battles between Central Banks and Governments during the great depression, and the plot of a Military Coup

Welcome to Finance and Fury, The Furious Friday Edition Last ep – lead up to the market crash of 1929 - and how thanks to central bank leveraging once removed – the market crashed Today – want to run through the internal political wars that were created – similar...

New Miniseries overview

Hi everyone, and welcome to Finance and Fury. Today won’t be a full episode, unfortunately, I am a little unwell. I am providing a bit of an overview of what the next few episodes will be about. When making investments, it’s all about considering what will be the best...

An economic and fiscal update and examining the 2020 budget

Welcome to Finance and Fury Budget came out last week – this episode – go through the fiscal overview and the policy measures in it Fiscal overview – provided updates on the government budget position and economic updates Government – added $289 billion in fiscal...

What does Central Bank issued cryptocurrency look like?

Welcome to Finance and Fury, the Furious Friday Edition Welcome to FF FF – Hasn’t been a FF in a while – but last was running through Crypto markets in relation to the BIS and powers that be Today – Want to cover the potential of what central banks using crypto and by...

Don’t get tricked by a rebounding share market after a large loss

Welcome to Finance and Fury. Today is a share market update. Don’t get tricked by the rebound in prices. We will be looking a bit into the pattern recognitions in relation to markets The market is low compared to 3 months ago – if looking at 10 years in the future –...

Furious Fridays: The Death of Stalin

Furious Fridays The Death of Stalin Last episode we ended with Lenin’s death. The roll out of Communism was well underway and it was time for new leadership. One his last policies before he died in 1924 was the New Economic Policy (NEP) in 1922… A mixed economy put in...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This