Welcome to Finance and Fury, The Say What Wednesday Edition
This week question comes from Matt –
Not so sure if this is your area of expertise or have come across this at all, although I have a question regarding insurance and identification of gender. People know that gender affects the price of insurance premiums paid and can save a significant amount if one were to identify as a female for insurance to pay less, would this be legal or do insurance companies have a way around this.
Cheers – from Matt,
Thanks for getting in touch. That is an awesome question!
- Actually, laughed out loud when this came through – very interesting point –
- Especially if someone does identify as another gender
- Today’s episode –
- Talk about disclosure requirements and pricing between male and females –
- Different genders pay different amounts for the types of covers
Disclosure requirements – Under current insurance legislation – non-disclosure
- Insurance companies only offer the options of male or female for the applications, which often is confirmed in the medical underwriting process
- No other when looking at actuary – a professional who deals with the measurement and management of risk and uncertainty
- Statistics are what insurance companies work with – based in reality and stats on claim history
- Interesting issue – people identifying as new genders
- Contacted underwires – will look at covers – but assess as biological – not what is identified as
- The underwriters would need medical assessments -makes it much harder to get
- If the incorrect gender does slip through the application process, Insurance companies would likely be able to get out of paying a claim due to ‘non-disclosure’. I.e. saying you are a female when actually you are a male would give the insurance companies an out from making any payment.
Premiums for genders –
- Premiums differ for a number of reasons – but all comes down to chance to claim
- Ages – really young – slightly higher, about 25-35 cheaper – then after 35 goes up more
- Occupations – low-risk office jobs, versus underground mining
- Health factors – smoking, pre-existing conditions –
- Smoking likely 50% more in most cases
- Genders – different genders claim on different covers
- The Income protection premiums are higher for females while Life cover premiums are higher for males,
- There is no clear winner in gender when it comes to overall, who pays the least amount – depends on the level of covers and types of covers
Run quotes
– two people Aged 40 – working in office admin job – same incomes $80k
- Life – $500k – More expensive for males = 32% more
- Male – $254
- Female – $192
- TPD – $500k – About the same
- Female – $192
- Male – $192
- Income Protection – $5,000 per month – more expensive for females = 56% more
- Male – $1,164 + 111 = $1,275
- Female – $1,816 +170 = $1,986
- Trauma – $200k – More expensive for females = 12% more
- Male – $610
- Female – $684
- Totals – $2,475 p.a. for male and $3,206 p.a. for females – due to claims history and likelihood to claim
Depending on if you need more Life – the female is cheaper, if you are male, IP is cheaper – but have to disclosure biological gender – assessment is based around this and underwriters would write off to doctors
- If you don’t give real gender – it will likely create a reason for insurance companies to get out of paying out
Thanks again for the great question. If you want to have a question answered visit https://financeandfury.com.au/contact/